Federal tax
...now browsing by tag
Efile your return now!
Friday, March 19th, 2010Deadlines Near for Business to Choose Expanded NOL Election
Friday, September 11th, 2009The IRS has put out a friendly reminder to individuals and corporations that the deadlines for expanded loss carry backs are rapidly approaching.
WASHINGTON — Eligible taxpayers must act soon if they want to take advantage of the expanded business loss carryback option included in this year’s Recovery law. According to the Internal Revenue Service, eligible calendar-year corporations have until Sept. 15, and eligible individuals have until Oct. 15 to choose this special option.
This carryback provision offers small businesses that lost money in 2008 an excellent way to quickly get some much needed cash if they were profitable in previous years. This option is only available for a limited time, so small businesses should consider it carefully and act before it’s too late.
Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), enacted in February, many small businesses that had expenses exceeding their income for 2008 can choose to carry the resulting loss back for up to five years, instead of the usual two. This means that a business that had a net operating loss (NOL) in 2008 could carry that loss as far back as tax-year 2003, rather than the usual 2006. Not only could this mean a special tax refund, but the refund could be larger, because the loss is being spread over as many as five tax years, rather than just two.
This option may be particularly helpful to any eligible small business with a large loss in 2008. A small business that chooses this option can benefit by:
* Offsetting the loss against income earned in up to five prior tax years,
* Getting a refund of taxes paid up to five years ago,
* Using up part or all of the loss now, rather than waiting to claim it on future tax returns.Under ARRA, eligible taxpayers can choose to carry back a NOL arising in a taxable year beginning or ending in 2008 for three, four or five years instead of two. Eligible taxpayers are eligible small businesses (ESB) that have no more than an average of $15 million in gross receipts over a three-year period ending with the tax year of the NOL. This includes a sole proprietor that qualifies as an ESB, an individual partner in a partnership that qualifies as an ESB and a shareholder in an S corporation that qualifies as an ESB. This choice may be made for only one tax year.
Taxpayers must choose this special carryback by either:
* Attaching a statement to an income tax return for the tax year that begins or ends in 2008 or,
* Claiming a refund on Form 1045, Application for Tentative Refund or Form 1139, Corporation Application for Tentative Refund, or on an amended return for the tax year to which the NOL is being carried back.Most taxpayers still have time to choose the special carryback and get a refund. A calendar-year corporation that qualifies as an ESB must make this choice by Sept. 15, 2009. For individuals, the deadline is Oct. 15, 2009. Deadlines vary for fiscal-year taxpayers, depending upon when their fiscal year ends and whether they are making the choice for the tax year that ends or begins in 2008.
A calendar-year taxpayer that chooses the special carryback by attaching a statement to the income tax return has until December 31, 2009, to claim the refund on Form 1045 or 1139, or 3 years after the due date (including extensions) for filing the 2008 income tax return to claim a refund on an amended return.
These forms, along with answers to frequently-asked questions about this special carryback, and other details can be found on IRS.gov.
Late IRA Rollover Penalty Can Be Waived
Wednesday, September 9th, 2009On September 4, 2009, the IRS issued Private Letter Ruling 200936048 in which it waived the 60 day IRA rollover requirement for a taxpayer who had a medical condition preventing her from accomplishing the rollover. Internal Revenue Code Section 408(d)(3)(I) allows the Secretary to waive the requirement “where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement“. The following is the redacted text of the letter sent to the taxpayer.
Dear _______________,
This is in response to a letter dated April 3, 2009, from your authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A, age 86, asserts that her failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d) due to her medical condition which impaired her ability to make financial decisions.
Taxpayer A represents that she was the owner of IRA X, a qualified individual retirement arrangement (“IRA”) established and maintained at Financial Institution B under the rules of section 408 of the Code. On Date D, Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution totaling Amount 1 from IRA X and used the proceeds (Amount 1) to purchase two separate non-IRA CDs at Financial Institution C on Date E. Taxpayer A, whose deceased husband handled the financial aspects of the household, was unaware that Amount 1 was invested in a tax-deferred account and that such distribution, if not deposited within 60 days into another IRA, would be taxable at her current income tax rate. Taxpayer A represents that Amount 1 is now in Accounts F and G at Financial Institution C and has not been used for any purpose. Taxpayer A’s granddaughter (who is also her authorized representative) has represented that Taxpayer A’s family members have, over the past five years, witnessed the deterioration of Taxpayer A’s mental capacity and her ability to make sound financial decisions. The ruling request is accompanied by a statement from Taxpayer A’s doctor, which provides, in part, that Taxpayer A “. . . has worsening dementia and depression which may affect her judgment and insight. This may result in poor decisions.”
Based on the above facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1. Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers. Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if:
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
The information presented and the documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount 1 was due to medical conditions which impaired her ability to manage her financial affairs.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60- day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA X.
Pursuant to this ruling letter, Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days measured from the date of the issuance of this letter ruling to make a rollover contribution of an amount equal to Amount 1 to an IRA (or IRAs) described in section 408(a) of the Code. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such IRA contribution, the contribution will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the code.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact *’` ****** ‘~ (Government Identification Number – ***** ) by phone at (‘`*~`) or by fax at ( *** ) *** – **** . Please address all correspondence to
Sincerely,
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures: ip. Deleted copy of ruling letter
P. Notice of Intention to
Disclose cc:
To amend or not to amend
Tuesday, August 4th, 2009You’ve discovered an error or determined that you are entitled to a previously unclaimed credit or deduction, after your tax return has been filed. Do you need to amend your tax return?
The IRS usually corrects math errors or requests missing forms – such as W-2s or schedules – when processing an original return. In these instances, do not amend your return.
However, you should file an amended return if any of the following were reported incorrectly:
Your filing status
Your dependents
Your total income
Your deductions or credits
You may also elect to amend your 2008 return if you are eligible to claim the new first-time homebuyer credit of up to $8,000 for a qualified 2009 home purchase. The amended tax return will allow you to claim the homebuyer credit on your 2008 return without waiting until next year to claim it on the 2009 return.
Use Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, to correct a previously filed Form 1040, 1040A or 1040EZ submitted electronically or by mail. Be sure to enter the year of the return you are amending at the top of Form 1040X. If you are amending more than one tax return, prepare a 1040X for each return and mail them in separate envelopes to the IRS processing center for the area in which you live. The 1040X instructions list the addresses for the centers.
The Form 1040X has three columns. Column A is used to show original or adjusted figures from the original return. Column C is used to show the corrected figures. The difference between the figures in Columns A and C is shown in Column B. There is an area on the back of the form where you explain the specific changes being made to the return and the reason for each change.
If the changes involve other schedules or forms, attach them to the Form 1040X. For example, if you are filing a 1040X because you have a qualifying child and now want to claim the Earned Income Credit, you must attach a Schedule EIC to show the qualifying person’s name, year of birth and Social Security number.
If you are filing to claim an additional refund, wait until you have received your original refund before filing Form 1040X. You may cash that check while waiting for any additional refund. If you owe additional tax for 2008, you should file Form 1040X and pay the tax as soon as possible to limit interest and penalty charges. Interest is charged on any tax not paid by the due date of the original return, without regard to extensions.
Generally, to claim a refund, you must file Form 1040X within three years from the date you filed your original return or within two years from the date you paid the tax, whichever is later.
Tax Break for Mortgage Help, Not for Unemployment?
Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009The IRS has taken two positions which on the surface appear to conflict with each other. Is anyone surprised? On one hand they have given a break to folks getting incentives under the mortage assisance program. On the other hand unemployment benefits are taxable income. The IRS issued an official position concerning the taxability of incentive payments received by homeowners under the US Government’s Home Affordable Modification Program or HAMP. Revenue Ruling 2009-19 states that Revenuers will treat any incentives received by already struggling homeowners will fall under the exception carved into tax law that excludes welfare benefits. The law states Click to continue »
Beware of States on Canceled Debt Deferral
Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009I attended a tax seminar in New York today. I know, I live this wild, exciting life! One of the presenters pointed out a very good point. It is vital that you look at your state tax treatment on the cancellation of debt. While Federal tax law now says you can defer this gain many states do not agree. (Click here to see my previous post regarding the Federal break on the cancellation of business loans.) You could very well have a state tax burden on your canceled debt. Many states that normally base corporate tax on Federal law are “de-coupling” on this issue. This is a tax term that means the state is specifically excluding this break. California is one big state that has not added this break. In the current economic climate, with states desperate for tax dollars, it’s a good bet that most states will not give you benefit of this Federal tax break.
IRS Hiring Hundreds of New Agents
Thursday, May 28th, 2009The IRS is hiring hundreds of Internal Revenue Agents! What does this mean for taxpayers? Does this signal the beginning of a new era of heavy enforcement activity? Considering the fact that April tax revenue collected by the US government fell by more than 30%. It only stands to reason that the government will start some more heavy handed collection and enforcement and these new agents will be taking the field to do just that. If you have been putting off taking care of a tax issue, you should consider getting it settled as soon as possible.
The IRS has begun a major hiring effort to fill hundreds of critical jobs nationwide. Most of these Click to continue »
Relief on Cancellation of Business Debt Taxation
Monday, May 18th, 2009Have you renegotiated a business note or loan? Paid the note holder a lower amount than the principal balance currently owing in satisfaction of the note? This could be a great tip to postpone the tax impact. Yes, I said tax impact. Under normal circumstances the amount of loan that was “extinguished” without being paid should be “Cancellation of Debt” income to you. This applies whether you are operating as a corporation or as an individual. Well the 2009 Recovery Act has come to your rescue. Under the new law if you reacquire business debt you can elect to postpone the payment of tax. This is where it gets good. You get to spread the effects over five years! Not good enough? How about this? Click to continue »
Canceled Debt – A Tax Nightmare?
Friday, May 1st, 2009In today’s troubled economy it is more and more common for common folks to negotiate mortgages and end up with better terms. In some extreme situations the bank may actually cancel some, or rarely, all of the principal balance of an outstanding loan. If you find yourself int his position be sure you know what the tax consequences are!
The general rule is; cancellation of debt income is taxable as ordinary income. Internal Revenue Code section 61 provides that gross income means all income regardless of the source from which it is derived. Section 61(a)(12) specifically includes “income from discharge of indebtedness” as an item of gross income.
Cancellation of debt (COD) income can arise in a number of areas, such as: Click to continue »